On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:52:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > For packages that overlap outside of base+optional, could we just agree > to allow SRPM rebuilds with the exception that the EPEL release numbers > must always be less than the official RHEL release numbers? > > i.e. if we have mypackage-1.0-8.el6 in the HA channel, we can opt to > repackage it in EPEL if-and-only-if the release number is 7.9 or lower > (making it mypackage-1.0-7.9.el6).
That could be part of a solution but it's not all of a solution because the packages we could get from the channels can conflict with each other (mypackage-1.0-8.el6 might be in os, for instance, and mypackage-1.1-2.el6 might be in CloudForms. Or myfoo-1.0-1.el6 is in ha and myfoo-2.0-1.el6 is in RHVT). -Toshio
pgpNUDZkwLHf0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
