On 06/15/2012 11:43 AM, inode0 wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:27:30 -0500
inode0 <ino...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sorry if this has been answered before and I have forgotten the
answer but why are the lb and ha bits excluded? Was there a request
from the RHEL side to exclude them?
They were added to our buildsystem a while back because they contained
dependencies that were used by epel packages. There wasn't a formal
request that I know of, but it was requested by several maintainers.
I suppose we could look at dropping them.
No, I don't want them dropped from the build system. I want to know
why piranha can't be packaged by EPEL for example?
Well, piranha is shipped by ScientificLinux (and probably CentOS), presumably
because the srpm is in 6Server, so you would end up with conflicts there. If
you are a paying RedHat customer and want support, presumably you would
purchase the relevant channel as well to get piranha?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
