Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In this entire thread, you have done NO work beyond long long emails. > You haven't come up with a list of packages that would be impacted, > you haven't offered to come up with the changes to the build system > you would need to make the extra channels. You support no packages > in EPEL.
If you say I have no maintainer worth or other record in the Fedora Project and/or EPEL SIG, I'm guilty as charged. No argument. > You have attended no meetings. I have read each and every meeting log over the last few months. In fact, the only reason I even took an interest was because of customer concerns. > And somehow you are surprised that no one "listens" and the people who > have done any or all of the above have an opinion different than > yours. Maybe banging your head will enlighten you that your method of > 40+ lines emails and multiple responses is not working. I know we're all busy. And I recognize I've taken out a couple hours a week to write the e-mails. I'm also engaged many more hours on this from customer perspectives as well. My maintainership is elsewhere right now. I'm sure many have as well, yet they find the time for EPEL maintanership that I do not. At the same time. But it doesn't mean several of my warnings are not untrue. I think this continued path shoots the project in the foot, and undoes 10 years of RHEL history, including how the EL Rebuilds have traditionally approached add-on channels. But with that, I will end. I appreciate all of the project leaders on trying to address this and hoping to find a solution. I will go back to lurking and advise my customers correspondingly based on decisions. -- Bryan J Smith - Professional, Technical Annoyance _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
