On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:30:27AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >
> > You're thinking about php53 also providing php = %{version}-%{release}?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Otherwise you'd produce an interesting pile of dependencies. Those
> > packages also need to obsolete the older packages and must be marked as
>
> They can.
Actually -- maybe not. We would need to check if that would lead yum
to upgrade php53 to php54 because php53 was providing php = 5.3 and
php54 obsoleted php < 5.4.
--
Jan Pazdziora | adelton at #satellite*, #brno
Principal Software Engineer, Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
epel-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
