On 6 December 2012 10:58, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:45:54AM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Ok looking at the security plugin code it seems it bases its decisions >> on what is already stored in the repodata. That being the case any >> sort of plugin is going to need to have extra stuff stored in repodata >> which means changes to createrepo, rpm, yum-utils, and yum. I don't >> think this is going to happen so we might as well look for some other >> solution. > > Why not? The security metadata wasn't always there and _that_ feature got > added.
It got added before RHEL-6 was out the door. EPEL does not control yum, createrepo, rpm or yum-utils for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Getting it into there means working with Fedora yum/rpm developers on how it will be stored.. getting it working in Fedora, then figuring out how to back port that to the RHEL-5 and RHEL-6 yum's. Then working with Red Hat on allowing for a large ABI break where old yum users are guarenteed to still be able to make yum commands without yum crashing and that new yum users won't crash when reading old yum repos. > -- > Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > epel-devel-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list -- Stephen J Smoogen. "Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it." Linus Torvalds "Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
