On 22 January 2013 08:22, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:05:42 -0700 > Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 21 January 2013 12:11, Russell Golden >> <niveusl...@www2.niveusluna.org> wrote: >> > I have a question that may better address the problem. At least to >> > me. >> > >> > Why does epel-release need to change so much in the first place? >> >> I believe it is due to key signing. The key is signed against the >> other Fedora Keys. So when the F18 key or some other key comes out, >> the EPEL key gets signed with it. > > It doesn't change very often at all. From the changelog: > > * Sun Nov 04 2012 <stah...@fedoraproject.org> - 6-8 > - Fix URL bz #870686 > > * Wed May 09 2012 Jens Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> - 6-7 > - add ppc64 to ghc_arches >
Dude.. what have we told you about bringing real facts into an EPEL argument? Now we have to come up with a new conspiracy. PS thanks. I should have checked the rpm and not the memory. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it." Linus Torvalds "Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
