On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:19:44 -0600 inode0 <ino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Your situation probably explains most of the two large groups where > either we see the same version or we see a lower version lingering in > EPEL. > > Why not generate these lists and exclude the packages in question from > the metadata built for architectures where they are included in RHEL?
Yeah, I suppose we could hard code such a list into mash. I don't think the mash maintainers have time/desire to do this. Would anyone else be willing to look into it? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
