On 14/01/14 14:27, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

El Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:18:38 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> escribió:
On 10/01/14 23:52, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Hi All,

Se we have composes working automatically now, the job had been
failing. I'm trying to get epel 7 to the point where the packaging
tools are available on epel7. hopefully that will be by the end of
today. In order to submit builds for epel7 you need to have
fedpkg-1.15-1 installed, versions prior will fail due to not
understanding the epel7 branch.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7 lists all the packages in
RHEL 7 Beta.


Please put branching request in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/epel7/Requests if you think of a
better way to file requests please speak up.


We will do some checking that the package is not in RHEL before
branching but please check the list if you are not sure.

I'm getting along nicely with most of my packages, but I'm having
trouble pushing a single fast-forward commit for one of my packages:

$ git status
# On branch epel7
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/epel7' by 1 commit.
#   (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
#
nothing to commit, working directory clean
$ fedpkg push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: W refs/heads/epel7 perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma pghmcfc DENIED by
refs/heads/epel[0-9]
remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/epel7
To ssh://[email protected]/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma
   ! [remote rejected] epel7 -> epel7 (hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://[email protected]/perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma'
Could not execute push: Command '['git', 'push']' returned non-zero
exit status 1

Any ideas? The branch is done in git but I didn't get the email about
it being added to pkgdb, and a pkgdb query doesn't show the epel7
branch. Something gone wrong during branching?

Im guessing you put EL-6 as the acl source in your request, and the
package currently does not exist in EPEL so you needed to use devel as
the source to copy the acls from. I thought it was clear what you
needed to do, but apparently not so please help to make the wording
better so that everyone gets it. you will need to put in a new request
with the correct acl source

Whoops. I did see that and understood it too. Virtually all of my packages go all the way back to EL-5 and there are very few without an EL-6 branch so I forgot to check in this case and just put EL-6 out of habit. Sorry about that, branch re-requested.

Regards, Paul.

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Reply via email to