On 03/20/2014 05:15 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I have been thinking about this and wondering if SCL's might be better > under Robyn's "EPIC" (Extra Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds) I hate that name, but the idea behind the repo is sound. > would be something that could have less rigid rules for keeping going for > 12 years that would be more in line with SCL's 2-3 year lifetimes. I was > going to bring it up as a FLOCK talk to get the ball running with possible > interaction with the CentOS group (maybe joining with their SCL > operations). Does that make sense? > It makes sense to me as well. Could you elaborate a bit on how you envision this working? What role do you see CentOS playing? (yes I'm impatient and don't want to wait for FLOCK :-P ) -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel