-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2015 12:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>>> Also, this would probibly be some kind of big deal to some >>>>> people who like that EPEL is built against rhel. >>>>> Personally, I don't think it matters, but it would have to >>>>> be communicated clearly. >>> >>> (I also saw Karsten reply about it) It needs to be >>> communicated, but considering CentOS good history on that >>> matter, I personally don't think it's big deal, too. > It is a much bigger deal politically than technically
I agree it's a big deal, but think it's more about 'supportability', which is the crossroads for technical, end-user needs, business dynamics, community capability, and so forth. I personally *like* that Red Hat support has comfort level with pointing customers at EPEL; I don't want that to change. To me that is a core promise from the community to our end-users, wherever they are from. - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYCDJwACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEH2QQCg1cBadVBZYMjuAorV0xzjB8gj mIYAn1yiflU1kFwJG1pVOnp3ryuqgMM7 =Ds5V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
