On 27 March 2016 at 08:52, Dave Love <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Jason L Tibbitts III <[email protected]> > writes: > >> If you have a build dependency on the SCL tools then you're obviously >> not building for EPEL, > > Well, I'm building for people running EPEL, and I didn't see this isn't > with packages that depend on anything scl. The scl stuff needs to be > installed initially, e.g. in copr root parameters, if you're going to > build scl packages at some stage. > > (I don't understand why software collections aren't allowed so that more > packages could be contributed.) >
You are running into one of the issues about why they weren't allowed in base Fedora. This isn't the only macro problem that has come up and while they each get eventually dealt with by the SCL guys.. it is a whack-a-mole game... >> DL> Will the scl bug mentioned not be fixed? >> >> That would be up to whoever maintains the SCL macros. > > Of course. I was thinking in terms of (lack of?) response to a bug > report which might get someone to look to it. > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected] -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
