On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:13:44 -0400 > Avram Lubkin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm looking for some clarification on the naming requirements for >> SRPMs. >> >> In the EPEL 7 in Python 3 Plan Draft [1], it specifies that SRPM names >> can't conflict with RHEL SRPM names, but in the Limited Arch Packages >> [2]section of EPEL: Packaging, it seems to imply the SRPM name would >> be the same, but the release number would be pretended with "0.". >> >> Could someone please clarify? >> >> If, in fact, the name can be the same, it will make it much easier to >> provide Python 3 packages for EPEL since a separate package would not >> be required in the Fedora Package DB. > > So, here's the thing (at least as I understand it): > > koji operates on source packages. > > If there's a package in RHEL called 'foo' and also one in EPEL called > 'foo' it will use the epel one in all cases for everything that foo > makes. > > So, with the limited arch packages this means that _ALL_ things > building in koji will use the epel package. The reason for the > prepended 0 is so that users don't install the epel package and instead > get the newer rhel version. The limited arch guideline also says you > should try and keep the package as close as possible to the rhel > version. > > So, if we had say: python-foobar-1.0-1.el7.src.rpm in rhel that made a > python-foobar-1.0-1.noarch.rpm and then we made a epel > python-foobar-1.0-1.el7.src.rpm that had > python3-foobar-1.0-1.noarch.rpm it would mean anything that builds > against python-foobar in epel would break (it would be not found). End > users would be ok, but buildroots could be broken by it. > > So we are kinda in a lerch here... I think the best way is just new > packages with python3-whatever.
That doesn't make sense. Builds are done by pulling in base, epel, and buildroot repositories into a generated mock config and executed (i.e. passed to mock to build the SRPM and then the RPMs). No part of mock would have a problem here. Therefore, there is no reason for the absurdity of having python3-* SRPMs. Sure, Koji operates on SRPMs, but Fedora Koji does not build RHEL or CentOS. So this particular problem doesn't exist from that perspective either. Content from RHEL/CentOS essentially is a black box to Koji. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
