On 03/08/2017 12:28 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> OK there are a LOT of pages with EPEL information on them which are
> just plain wrong or dead in some way. I would like to get rid of these
> as a first pass so we can look at what is left over afterwords to see
> what would be a good cleanup afterwords.
> 
> Please review these and see if there is any information that should be
> put in a more condensed form elsewhere?
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/LongTerm
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/NextTestingStableMove
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/De_DE/EPEL
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/De_DE/EPEL/%C3%9Cber
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Bug_Day_2014
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Marketing
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Package_Wish_List
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Package_Wish_List/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL-meeting-process
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/EPEL_repositoryinfo
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FrontPageStarters
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FrontPageStarters/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/JeffSheltren/EPELMeetingTime
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/OpenIssues
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ReleaseManagers
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Schedule
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Schedule/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/WishList/rt3

Seems fine to remove to me.

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_QA

The stuff about updates staying in testing for two weeks still seems relevant.
 Not sure if it is anywhere else.

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatus/ja
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusYes
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo

I *think* the ContributorStatusNo was partially useful.  The idea being that
if you want a package in EPEL and the maintainer was on this list you didn't
have to bug them first before putting in a SCM request.  I suppose now you can
simply put in a branch request in pkgdb though, so probably even less useful
currently.


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       [email protected]
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to