On Qua, 2017-04-19 at 12:03 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/14/2017 12:05 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > OK something for people to help with: > > > > There is a po4a package which over-rides the version that is in > > RHEL-7 > > optional. It needs to be removed from EPEL and packages depending > > on > > it need to be rebuilt against the RHEL version with a bump in NEVR > > get > > pulled on updates. > > Well, I filed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443685 > > Unfortunately to match the limited arch guidelines the package needs > to > be _older_ than it is now in epel. > > I'm not sure if we can get yum to do the right thing and downgrade > it, > but we could try.
ah , I built po4a to build dpkg on epel7 , but in fact po4a was added to centos 7 some moments before (I don't know if in RHEL7) and that is why it misses ppc64 arch [1] IIRC. BTW it also misses on ppc64, perl- gettext [2], maybe should be good also coordinate the fix of this package too. If you could fix these 2 packages may the best is remove po4a from epel7 repo , if it is possible ... or bump epoch on RHEL7 ... Best regards, [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/po4a.git/tree/po4a.spec#n79 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196539 > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject. > org -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
