On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:22:01 -0400
Stephen John Smoogen <smo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> However, this was decided a while ago and it may not be the best
> convention to use or one that the current python sig would like us to
> use. I would like to get a naming convention cleared up and documented
> so when we do a mass rebuild that the packages come out with either a
> python3-<foo> or python36-<foo>

I'd very much prefer python3-<foo> naming just because it would make
python3 packaging much more consistent with fedora.

But I'd want to point out that add problem to all packages currently
named as python3-<foo> (packages where python2 counterpart is part of

Because python3-<foo> can't have sub-package named python3-<foo>.

Tuomo Soini <t...@foobar.fi>
Foobar Linux services
+358 40 5240030
Foobar Oy <https://foobar.fi/>
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to