Here are the list of packages with bad dependencies, their bug URL,
and current status.
For those that still have "No Comment" tomorrow, I will start going
through and fixing.
For those that want to be removed, I'll be doing that tomorrow as well.

airinv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647583
- Rebuilt - On QA
anjuta https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648003
- Rebuilt - On QA
banshee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647999
- No Comment
beets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647995
- Wants Removed
bionetgen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647989
- Rebuilt - On QA
cinnamon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647181
- Want Removed
cjdns-graph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647987
- Rebuilt - On QA
jabber-roster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647977
- No Comment
libpeas-loader-python3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647973
- No Comment
notify-sharp3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647623
- No Comment
opensips https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647622
- No Comment
perl-GTop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647620
- Rebuilt - On QA
python-atomic-reactor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647613
- Wants Removed
python-django16 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647611
- Rebuilt - On QA
python-proliantutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647614
- No Comment
python-adal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647605
- Assigned
python-pyfakefs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647603
- No Comment
python-pygithub https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647602
- No Comment
python-yamlordereddictloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647597
- No Comment
ruby-qpid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647592
- No Comment (I recommend removal)
rubygem-apipie-bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647585
- Wants Removed
simcrs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647584
- Rebuilt - On QA
slim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647581
- No Comment
xfce4-vala https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647569
- Rebuilt - On QA
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:35 PM Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm going through the lists of EPEL7 packages that are not able to be
> > installed on RHEL 7.6, and opening bugzilla's for them.  I am keeping
> > track of all those bugs with a tracker bug.[1]
> > My apologies to the epel-release maintainers for using their package
> > for the tracker.
> >
> > I've only created 6 bugs thus far, and only 1 of those bugs is because
> > of RHEL 7.6.
> > Because I'm verifying each failed install, and tracking down the basic
> > problem, it's taking me a little longer.  It might take a couple of
> > days.
> > I'll send an email when I'm done.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647564
>
> I'm pretty much done for now.
> I didn't do any nodejs or golang bugs because all of their failing
> dependencies are in EPEL, not RHEL.  Or perhaps I should say they
> *aren't* in EPEL :)
>
> A few numbers
>
> bugs created for uninstallable EPEL7 packages - 24
> nodejs uninstallable packages - 11
> golang uninstallable packages - 18
>
> Total EPEL7 binary packages[2] - 12,547
> ^^ Above installable on RHEL 7.6 - 12,043
> ^^ Above not installable on RHEL 7.6 - 504
>
> Why such a big difference between 504 uninstallable binary packages,
> but only 53 potential bugs?
> 1 - bugs are against source packages.  The bottom checks are against
> binary packages.  My guess is that the 50 bugs cover about 150 binary
> packages because each source can have more than one package.  And when
> I was looking at the packages, it looked like about an average of
> three binaries per source.
> 2 - repoquery (used to generate the bug list) went to the heart of the
> problems.  So if package A is uninstallable, and package B depends on
> A.  We don't file a bug for package B, only A.  For some of those
> nodejs packages, I've seen one package A with a bad dependency, cause
> 25 to 50 package B's, who aren't installable due to A not being
> installable.
> 3 - It's possible that we might have missed a few packages.
>
> Troy
>
> [2] - "binary packages" are the packages that you get build an rpm.
> It doesn't mean the package contain *only* binaries, because it might
> be an rpm full of scripts, or just documentation.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to