On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:24 AM Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 11:19, Richard Shaw <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 09:34, Richard Shaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Will this also allow more significant upgrades of EPEL packages > between minor releases? > >> > > >> > >> That is the purpose if the package maintainer and their consumers want > it. > > > > > > Ok. I ran into an issue on EPEL 7 where I needed to update a package so > it could work with a package that was part of a Review Request. Then I > found out someone was using my library as part of validated software they > were developing. Lesson learned the hard way. Assuming this goes through I > will be able to update on point releases and they can chose whether to > update their whole system or not, in which case they would have to > revalidate anyway. > > > > Correct, and they can also grab the old version out of archives and do > what they want versus dig through koji to find it. Then +1000 from me :) Thanks, Richard
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
