On 3/11/19 7:54 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:

> 
> Thanks for the feedback.  You too Miro.
> After reading both of your reasons for doing A), I agree with you both.
> Unless anyone objects, we'll plan to do option A
> 
> We only have one package left that fails it's rebuild, python-apsw.
> I'm hoping someone can figure out the reason for the %checks failling. [1]
> If we can get that fixed, I'll be all set to do the mass update later today.
> 
> If we are only going to have these builds in -testing for a couple of
> weeks, how about we shoot for April 2.
> I'll be unavailable from March 20-April 2.  That would give us 3 weeks.
> Hopefully by then we would have announcements made letting people know
> the change is coming.

Sounds good to me.

As soon as the update exists and is pushed to testing we should mail
epel-announce and possibly fedora-devel announce about it and mention
that it will go stable in 3 weeks if nothing serious is found.

And perhaps some blog posts or the like also?

kevin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to