Thanks a lot for the helpful answer.  I will request the fuse3 repo or
get the current fuse maintainer to do it.

Dave

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 12:33:37PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "DD" == David Dykstra <d...@fnal.gov> writes:
> 
> DD> Does this also imply a new fuse3 package in pagure & bodhi?  Or
> DD> could it still be part of the fuse package but have a separate
> DD> fuse3.spec?
> 
> It would have to be a separate package repository and receive separate
> updates.  It is not possible for a source package in EPEL to have the
> same name as a source package in RHEL, even if the build products
> (binary RPMs) have different names.
> 
> Note that a package review is not required to create a package
> repository named "fuse3" (or "fuse3.7" or whatever) when the "fuse"
> package repository already exists.  See
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process
> When running fedpkg request-repo, use the --exception flag.
> 
>  - J<
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to