On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 17:29, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 at 23:06, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > [...] > > This is not a zero cost on our side to keep this going, and its benefits > > are currently to 90 systems versus 1.5 million systems (x86_64). If it is > > important enough that we need to keep doing it, then we will have to find > > something else to drop. > > Are these numbers the number of unique IPs accessing EPEL repos? > If yes, the difference in magnitude is staggering and I have no > doubts it's not worth the effort to keep maintaining ppc64 builders > for such small user base. > > 88 ppc64 217 ppc64le 38 659 x86_32 1 591 787 x86_64 are the average at least 1 checkin per unique ip address per day. > Oh well. At least I managed to report quite a few endianness-related > bugs thanks to ppc64 support in Fedora. ;) > > Regards, > Dominik > -- > Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org > There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and > oppression to develop psychic muscles. > -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
