On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 17:18, Michael Cronenworth <[email protected]> wrote: > > The lack of uniformity among arches on RHEL 8 is becoming annoying. > > The latest one is a head-scratcher: > > No matching package to install: 'vulkan-devel' > > Really? RHEL 8 is not shipping vulkan on all arches? >
The only vulkan-devel I see in RHEL-8 is ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/mesa-vulkan-devel-18.3.1-5.el8_0.x86_64.rpm so s390x, aarch64 and ppc64le do not have it. [smooge@batcave01 latest]$ find . -type f -print | grep vulkan ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/mesa-vulkan-devel-18.3.1-5.el8_0.x86_64.rpm ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/mesa-vulkan-drivers-18.3.1-5.el8_0.x86_64.rpm ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-headers-1.1.101.0-1.el8_0.noarch.rpm ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-loader-1.1.101.0-0.el8_0.x86_64.rpm ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-loader-devel-1.1.101.0-0.el8_0.x86_64.rpm ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-tools-1.1.101.0-1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm ./x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/vulkan-validation-layers-1.1.101.0-1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm so it looks like vulkan is only for x86_64 and no they did not ship the development packages. I believe this is one of those.. will need to be a module. > Thanks, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
