On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:45 AM Yaakov Selkowitz <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 06:37 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail. This one for example
- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39545162
Is using excludearch my only option? How can I get this built?
I think there's work or at least attempts to ask for these deps on all
arches, but I think for now you just need to exclude them.
Yep, this is a known issue
https://pagure.io/epel/issue/66
Currently, exludearch is the best option.
Is there a tracker for such cases so that we could go back and
enable these arches once the requisite packages land in RHEL thereon?
Not that I know of.
I just know of the packages I'm maintaining that I have to do this to.
If someone does have a tracker, it would be nice if they responded to
this thread so we could do that, cuz it seems like a good idea.
Is it possible to have a pseudo-arch or a macro ?
With something like (this probably has at least three errors):
excludeNotInRHEL80 = "excludearch i30 arm64"
we can flip it when the issue 66 is fixed to
excludeNotInRHEL80 = ""
and either everything will just work, or we will know what doesn't,
even before we remove the obsolete "exclude".
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
