A couple things I have on the agenda to think about * https://pagure.io/epel/issue/101 Policy for stalled EPEL requests - Is this something that we pursue, and figure out a new/better policy, or do we stick to the past way of doing it.
* With the -devel stuff in place, as we go through the issues related to missing packages, do we open the CentOS bugs on behalf of the person who filed the EPEL issue, or do we simple tell them about the procedure and let them file the bug. On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 2:00 PM <tdaw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-04-03 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC > At freenode@fedora-meeting > > The meeting will be about: > This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. > > A general agenda is the following: > > #meetingname EPEL > #topic Intros > #topic Old Business > #topic EPEL-6 > #topic EPEL-7 > #topic EPEL-8 > #topic Openfloor > #endmeeting > > > > > Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9722/ > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
