On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 21:21, Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote: > There does not appear to be an explicit conflict policy for EPEL8: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Does_EPEL_replace_packages_provided_within_Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_or_layered_products.3F > > I got a report against python3-s3transfer and python3-botocore > conflicting with the CentOS 8 HighAvailability repo. No idea if this is > an issue or not: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821630 > > It looks like we have avoided conflicts with the "ha" repos in the past, > and I can enable the rhel-8-for-x86_64-highavailability-rpms repo on my > RHEL8 developer license machine so it does seem available to everyone >
When EPEL-8 was getting set up, HA was a paid add-on for EL8 and so not available in the developer license. EPEL therefore did not conflict against it or use it as a 'you can't build this in EPEL'. EPEL will end up conflicting with some RHEL channels.. but since there is no 'Requires: Conflicts:' in repo land we can't do much about it. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
