On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 6:50 AM Petr Pisar <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:00:42PM -0500, Carl George wrote: > > To solve this problem, I am proposing that we create a new repository > called > > EPEL 8 Next. > > > > - built against CentOS 8 Stream > > - opt-in for packagers (must request epel8-next dist-git branch) > > - opt-in for users (part of epel-release but disabled by default) > > - used *with* epel8, not *instead of* > > > I agree with all of that. I only don't like the name. Why EPEL 8 Next? If > it > is to be use with Stream, why don't we call it EPEL 8 Stream? I think the > meaning of the repository would be easier to understand. >
I was thinking the same thing. EPEL stream is so much easier for users to understand. - Ken >
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
