On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Dan Horák <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Trey,
>
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:15:08 -0000
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora
> and appear to be receiving updates.  I found a wiki page that said to
> contact the maintainers via email but I was unable to find the emails
> associated with the maintainers so I opened a bugzilla but wasn't sure if I
> did this bugzilla in appropriate place:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947480
> >
> > I'd be happy to become the maintainer of conman for EPEL8 if that would
> help get conman RPMs into EPEL8.  Any pointers on how to go about getting
> conman into EPEL8 would be appreciated, in case the current approach I took
> is incorrect.
>
> sorry for not replying earlier, but if you are willing to maintain
> conman in EPEL, then the process should be fast. Are you already a
> packager in Fedora?
>
>
>                 Dan
> _______________________________________________
>

I have Fedora accounts that I setup many years ago and honestly don't
recall if I was ever setup to be a packager for Fedora. If there is a way
to verify if I am setup as a packager I'd be happy to check, but most
likely I am not a packager in Fedora.

Thanks,
- Trey
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to