On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:11 AM Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Trey Dockendorf wrote: > > I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've > also > > reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard > anything > > back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of > > pdsh. I would be happy to become the maintainer of the EPEL builds for > > pdsh. > > > If reaching out to them directly isn't getting results, there is the > non-responsive maintainer process: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/#steps > EPEL Packages have a modified version of the non-responsive package maintainer. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Stalled_EPEL_Requests This is for stalled requests, which is a bit different than non-responsive package maintainers. Fedora package maintainers don't have to do anything with EPEL if they don't want to, thus we needed it to be a bit different. Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
