On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:38 AM Michel Alexandre Salim < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-11-09 at 19:40 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:38 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007031 -- openssl > > > 3.x > > > won't be added to RHEL 8, while updated packages are starting to > > > need > > > it. > > > > > > It thus seems to be a good candidate for EPEL; the question is - > > > are we > > > allowed to maintain openssl3-* packages from the openssl srpm repo, > > > or > > > do we need to explicitly have an epel8-only (possibly F35 and F34 > > > too, > > > as they also don't have openssl3) 'openssl3' srpm repo? > > > > > > > You'll need an openssl3 SRPM repo, but you could have commits synced > > from openssl from CentOS Stream 9. > > > Ah, thanks. Is there a written policy disallowing renaming the package > in the spec like I did? (I sense it might not be fully legitimate, but > couldn't find anything). > > If I remember right, the spec file name needs to be in the format <dist-git-repo-name>.spec Thus, the spec file needs to be openssl3.spec, and thus you aren't really renaming it. :) Someone can correct me if I'm wrong about the spec file naming, but I had to do that for my various <package>-epel spec file. > Between syncing with Rawhide/Fedora and syncing with CS9, this will be > interesting. CS9 *does* have openssl 3.x and we generally don't want to > change this package too much, so if merging from a different package is > needed for maintenance anyway, maybe CS9 is the better 'upstream' to > use. > > Will check at the EPEL meeting today before proceeding, thanks! >
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
