As I was writing examples for requesting EPEL packages, the wording of the Stalled EPEL Requests policy was bothering me. I have created a pull request to clarify a stalled request.
https://pagure.io/epel/pull-request/129 It's not really a change in policy, just clarifying what I think we meant. -* A week goes by with no response +* A week goes by with no action +"Action" is considered something that progresses the bug. +"Action" can be positive or negative. Such as a response of "The code +has not been updated for 10 years and has security issues" and then they +close the ticket. +"No Action" could be no response at all, or it could be a response of +"I do not want to do epel" and then they do nothing else. Let me know what people think. Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
