On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:55 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > The limited arch policy we had for epel7 had a number of problems. > At first we just said 'rebuild the exact rhel version' and then we > switched to 'add a 0 to release so the rhel package always gets > installed in favor of it'.
It (probably?) would not hurt to have the epel repos have a higher cost in the repo config to discourage choosing the epel package over the rhel package (if all things are equal, but of course, they are not always equal). For some specific cases where I needed to build the -devel package in a copr (until or unless I can get the -devel packages shipped in CRB (or equivalent)) I have manually set the cost for the copr repos to be high so that for a non -devel install I got the rhel versions. I would love to know if there is a better way. It all just seems so non-optimal. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
