On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 6:38 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 07:56:15AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > It was talked about December 2021, and pushed off to the new year.
> > https://pagure.io/epel/issue/135
> > It's the new year, and you are the first this year to ask for it.  So, time
> > to get it back in the discussions.
> > Could you please put what modules you want to build in that ticket, so we
> > can help prioritize it.
>
> Personally, I'd be happy just not doing modules at all for epel9 given
> the limitations we have (cannot build any module that requires rhel
> modules). I'd prefer we have folks just use compatiblity packages
> instead.
>

What's stopping us from being able to depend on RHEL modules? Koji now
supports enabling module streams on a per tag basis, so it *should* be
possible now.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to