It was a configuration mix up that pulled in ALL the modules instead of
just the default ones.
It only lasted a week (I think) and has been fixed.
It was just bad timing, nothing you could have done to prevent, or fix it.

I thought we'd caught all the packages that were built that might have been
affected, but I guess we didn't catch them all.

Troy


On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 7:26 AM Sérgio Basto <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:34 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > V Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 12:29:06AM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > > On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 17:25 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095649
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > for some reason the build on epel 8 to update ImageMagick-6.9.12
> > > from
> > > 48 to 50 (
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1972114 )
> > > used  perl-libs-4:5.32.1-471.module+el8.6.0+13324+628a2397 from I
> > > guess
> > > modules repo
> >
> > Interesting. I'm courious how it could happen. DNF rejects installing
> > modular
> > packages if they are not listed in a defintion of a module stream. So
> > either
> > somebody enabled perl:5.32 stream explicitly (improbable), or mock
> > repositories in Koji are configured with module_hotfixes=true which
> > is alarming.
>
> "Koji are configured with module_hotfixes=true" , but usually  don't
> push  perl:5.32 stream , why this time it was pushed ? how I can avoid
> it ?
>
> Thank you
>
> > Koji configuration confirm the other theory:
> >
> > $ koji mock-config -a x86_64 --target epel8-candidate | grep
> > module_hotfixes
> > config_opts['yum.conf'] =
> > '[main]\ncachedir=/var/cache/yum\ndebuglevel=1\nlogfile=/var/log/yum.
> > log\nreposdir=/dev/null\nretries=20\nobsoletes=1\ngpgcheck=0\nassumey
> > es=1\nkeepcache=1\ninstall_weak_deps=0\nstrict=1\n\n#
> > repos\n\n[build]\nname=build\nbaseurl=
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-
> > build/4655904/x86_64\nmodule_hotfixes=1\n'
> >
> > I recommend Koji maintainers to add and use RHEL repositories next to
> > epel8-build with EPEL8 packages:
> >
> > [build]
> > name=build
> > baseurl=
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-build/4655904/x86_64
> >
> > [rhel-AppStream]
> > name=rhel-AppStream
> > baseurl=WHEREVER_FEDORA_TAKES_RHEL8_PACKAGES_FROM
> >
> > -- Petr
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > [email protected]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to