i dont need them but wasnt sure if required for epel to keep things complete and similar to the base package. how did you want me to change the names? i left it the same as in the original spec file, and named this one -epel after previous discussion on list

On 2022-08-24 17:13, Troy Dawson wrote:
I'm sure having all the fence agents in one package is nice for you, but if someone has both Fedora and RHEL based machines, they would appreciate the packages having the same naming conventions.
This is looking pretty good.
I'll do some poking about for the man pages.  How badly do you want the man pages?

Troy


On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:40 AM Alex Talaran <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    attached a new spec using 4.10 which should match el9 (desired distro
    version) as you noted.
    srpm and rpm still seem to build fine without man pages, still not sure
    how to generate them.

    On 2022-08-08 17:22, Troy Dawson wrote:
     > Hi Alex,
     > I've been looking into this some.
     >
     > What distribution do you want this for?
     > I haven't seen anywhere in your emails saying if this is for RHEL
    8 or
     > RHEL 9?
     > The spec file you have attached is for fence-agents-4.11, which
    is only
     > in Fedora, so that doesn't let me know either.
     >
     > The major problem is that the fence-agents-pve version has to
    match the
     > fence-agents that is in your version of RHEL.
     > So for RHEL8 (or compatible) it needs to be version 4.2.1.  For
    RHEL 9
     > it needs to be 4.10.0
     >
     > We need to start with the correct version of fence-agents and
    work from
     > there.
     >
     > Troy
     >
     > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:03 AM Alex Talaran <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
     >
     >     i was able to get this built and installable if anyone wants
    to help
     >     test or maintain it.
     >     an issue exists with the man pages not being built still but
    im not
     >     sure
     >     how the makefile target works for these so they are excluded
    for now.
     >
     >     maybe some other small tweaks are still needed too since its
    just a
     >     (first for me) stripped down and modified upstream spec file.
     >
     >     On 2022-07-20 08:47, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
     >      > On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Alex Talaran wrote:
     >      >
     >      >> i ended up with the same error with that change.
     >      >
     >      > I am sorry my suggestion did not help.
     >      > I don't have a Red Hat compatible machine newer that RHEL6
     >      > (I moved to Ubuntu for work-related reasons)
     >      > so I am unable to test things myself.
     >      >
     >      >> is it possible its getting confused because the dirname
    in the
     >     tarball
     >      >> is different than the package name and looking in the
    wrong spot?
     >      >
     >      > The -n fence-agents-%{version} in
     >      >      %prep
     >      >      %setup -q -n fence-agents-%{version}
     >      > is supposed to resolve that, but that setup line might
    need tweaking
     >      > to match the contents of the tarball.
     >      >
     >      > It is old and may be somewhat dated, but my bible for
    rewriting
     >     .spec
     >      > files was the book
     >      >     Maximum RPM - Taking the Red Hat Package Manager to
    the Limit
     >      > a version of which is available at
     >      > http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html
    <http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html>
     >     <http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html
    <http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html>>
     >      >
     >      >> On 2022-07-19 23:32, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
     >      >>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022, Alex Talaran wrote:
     >      >>>
     >      >>>> per a previous thread i took a shot at cleaning up the
     >     fence-agents
     >      >>>> rpm to only include the missing agents and make a new
    package.
     >     i am
     >      >>>> having some issues with the source url and getting it to
     >     build. the
     >      >>>> srpm is ok, but when i try to rebuild it into a proper
    rpm i
     >     get the
     >      >>>> following (output truncated):
     >      >>>>
     >      >>>> ---
     >      >>>> + py39_byte_compile /usr/bin/python3
     >      >>>>
>  /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence
     >      >>>> + python_binary='env PYTHONHASHSEED=0 /usr/bin/python3'
     >      >>>> +
     >      >>>>
>  bytecode_compilation_path=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence
     >      >>>> + env PYTHONHASHSEED=0 /usr/bin/python3 -s -B -m
    compileall -o
     >     0 -o
     >      >>>> 1 -s
     >     /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64
     >      >>>> -p /
     >      >>>>
>  /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence
     >      >>>> Listing
     >      >>>>
>  '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence'...
     >      >>>> Can't list
     >      >>>>
>  '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence'
     >      >>>> + chmod 0755
     >      >>>>
>  /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_pve.py /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_raritan.py /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_rcd_serial.py /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_virsh.py
     >      >>>> chmod: cannot access
     >      >>>>
>  '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_pve.py': No such file or directory
     >      >>>> chmod: cannot access
     >      >>>>
>  '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_raritan.py': No such file or directory
     >      >>>> chmod: cannot access
     >      >>>>
>  '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_rcd_serial.py': No such file or directory
     >      >>>> chmod: cannot access
     >      >>>>
>  '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_virsh.py': No such file or directory
     >      >>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.S10L6D
    (%install)
     >      >>>> ---
     >      >>>>
     >      >>>> i even tried to comment out the bytecompile lines but
    got the
     >     same
     >      >>>> error.
     >      >>>>
     >      >>>> is it possible to get some help sorting this out? i
    have attached
     >      >>>> the WIP spec file.
     >      >>>> thank you.
     >      >>>
     >      >>> I would try replacing
     >      >>>      mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/
     >      >>> with
     >      >>>      mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/fence
     >      >>>
     >      >>
     >      > _______________________________________________
     >     epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     >     <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
     >     To unsubscribe send an email to
     > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     >     <mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
     >     Fedora Code of Conduct:
     > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
>  <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>>
     >     List Guidelines:
     > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
     >     <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>>
     >     List Archives:
     >
    https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] 
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]> 
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] 
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]>>
     >     Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
     > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
    <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>
     >     <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
    <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>>
     >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     > To unsubscribe send an email to
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     > Fedora Code of Conduct:
    https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
    <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
     > List Guidelines:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
    <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
     > List Archives:
    https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] 
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]>
     > Do not reply to spam, report it:
    https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
    <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue>

_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to