On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdaw...@redhat.com> wrote: > > I have cleaned up the epel-next (both 8 and 9) repo's. > > If a package was newer in regular epel than in epel-next, the epel-next > package was untagged from epel{8,9}-next. > > If a package was the same version-release in both epel and epel-next, I made > sure the epel version was installable on CentOS Stream {8,9}, I also checked > that the epel-next branches were the same as the epel branch, I also checked > to see your building style. If everything pointed to "remove it from > epel-next", I untagged the epel-next package from epel{8,9}-next. > > If the epel-next package was newer than what's in epel, I left them alone. > > The vast majority of the cleanup happened yesterday, so you should be able to > see a smaller epel-next repo now. > > If I untagged a package that you feel should be in epel-next, let me know in > the next week or two and I can tag them back. > If I missed your package and you want me to untag it, also let me know.
Thanks for this Troy! -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue