On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading > libkdumpfile from 0.4.1 to the latest 0.5.1 in both EPEL 8 and 9. > > Bugzilla issues: > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162866 (for 0.5.1 in > general) > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168301 (for EPEL) > > Up to 0.4.1, libkdumpfile was packaged without the test suite being > run, and when I started work on packaging it in Debian I noticed a lot > of test failures on non-x86_64 architectures: > https://github.com/ptesarik/libkdumpfile/issues/40 > > This is now fixed (0.5.0 is the first version to pass tests cleanly > without additional patches on Fedora), but prior to its release we were > basically building in Fedora from a post-0.4.1 snapshot > ( > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libkdumpfile/blob/8b3b02e83af8326562a155581d77f04f2ae84197/f/libkdumpfile.spec > ) > that is likely not ABI compatible with the original 0.4.1 anyway, so > there's no reasonable way to backport the architecture fixes to 0.4.1. > > Change in sonames: > > [michel@f37-packaging ~]$ comm <(rpmdistro-repoquery fedora rawhide -- > provides libkdumpfile 2>/dev/null) <(rpmdistro-repoquery centos-stream > 9 --provides libkdumpfile 2>/dev/null) > libaddrxlat.so.2()(64bit) > libaddrxlat.so.2(LIBADDRXLAT_0)(64bit) > libaddrxlat.so.3 > libaddrxlat.so.3()(64bit) > libaddrxlat.so.3(LIBADDRXLAT_0) > libaddrxlat.so.3(LIBADDRXLAT_0)(64bit) > libkdumpfile = 0.4.1-5.el9 > libkdumpfile = 0.5.0-3.fc38 > libkdumpfile(x86-32) = 0.5.0-3.fc38 > libkdumpfile(x86-64) = 0.4.1-5.el9 > libkdumpfile(x86-64) = 0.5.0-3.fc38 > libkdumpfile.so.10 > libkdumpfile.so.10()(64bit) > libkdumpfile.so.10(LIBKDUMPFILE_0) > libkdumpfile.so.10(LIBKDUMPFILE_0)(64bit) > libkdumpfile.so.9()(64bit) > libkdumpfile.so.9(LIBKDUMPFILE_0)(64bit) > > Only drgn currently depends on libkdumpfile, and I plan to rebuild it > in the same updates: > > [michel@f37-packaging ~]$ rpmdistro-repoquery centos-stream 9 -- > whatrequires "libaddrxlat.so.2()(64bit)" > Last metadata expiration check: 0:12:30 ago on Wed Feb 8 11:02:35 > 2023. > libkdumpfile-devel-0:0.4.1-5.el9.x86_64 > libkdumpfile-util-0:0.4.1-5.el9.x86_64 > python3-libkdumpfile-0:0.4.1-5.el9.x86_64 > [michel@f37-packaging ~]$ rpmdistro-repoquery centos-stream 9 -- > whatrequires "libkdumpfile.so.9()(64bit)" > Last metadata expiration check: 0:12:40 ago on Wed Feb 8 11:02:35 > 2023. > drgn-0:0.0.22-1.el9.x86_64 > libkdumpfile-devel-0:0.4.1-5.el9.x86_64 > libkdumpfile-util-0:0.4.1-5.el9.x86_64 > python3-libkdumpfile-0:0.4.1-5.el9.x86_64 > > [michel@f37-packaging ~]$ rpmdistro-repoquery centos-stream-legacy 8 -- > whatrequires "libaddrxlat.so.2()(64bit)" > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Wed Feb 8 11:15:35 > 2023. > libkdumpfile-devel-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64 > libkdumpfile-util-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64 > python3-libkdumpfile-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64 > [michel@f37-packaging ~]$ rpmdistro-repoquery centos-stream-legacy 8 -- > whatrequires "libkdumpfile.so.9()(64bit)" > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:16 ago on Wed Feb 8 11:15:35 > 2023. > drgn-0:0.0.22-1.el8.x86_64 > libkdumpfile-devel-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64 > libkdumpfile-util-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64 > python3-libkdumpfile-0:0.4.1-5.el8.x86_64 > > [1]: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades/ > > Thanks, > If I am reading this correctly, the only package affected would be drgn (from python-drgn). It should hopefully just need a rebuild. Is that correct? Were you planning on rebuilding python-drgn, or contacting the package maintainer and having them do it? Troy
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
