On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 5:37 PM Gordon Messmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On UBI 10.0, the EPEL repo configuration will provide packages built for > 10.1. I don't know if that's a bug in the repo definition, or in the > redhat-release package, but it seems like it must be one of the two. >
This is broken as intended. If you want to use 10.0 EPEL content, you'll need to do it manually. > > So, I'd think that either the redhat-release package should provide > "system-release(releasever) = 10.0", or the epel repo definition should > detect and append the minor version in the URL (but that seems really > really ugly). > We tried. If the package provided the full releasever, a lot of things would have been simpler, but there were arguments that some Red Hat tooling couldn't handle it currently. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
