I've noticed that there seems to be two voting camps: the dev lead/plan campl and the project manager/plan camp. I fall into the latter for a few reasons: 1. I think OpenUP can be used for more than just software development. Why not following it for creating training material, or running a landscape architecture effort (that's what my wife does, for example)? The terms project mgr/plan are a bit more generic and therefore more applicable. 2. Project mgr/plan seems to be more widely used. For example, the PMI community is pretty specific about these terms (yes, hell may have frozen over, I had something good to say about PMI). 3. Project mgr/plan are a bit more scalable as terms than dev lead/plan.
Anyway, sorry for the interruption. Now back to our regularly scheduled program. ;-) - Scott On Thu, July 13, 2006 1:12 pm, Pascal Negros said: > SORRY CHRIS > I miss-checked the 2 first question which are different from the > assumption I stated at the beginning of my mail!! > I just resent it with the appropriate answers ... > Could you please consider this vote rather than the former one?? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Pascal Negros/France/IBM, 33-0869 > [EMAIL PROTECTED], +33 (0) 149 050 869 > Enterprise Architectures Engineering, Business Strategy Alignment, > Governance of Transformation > Blue Pages Get more > > > ----- Forwarded by Pascal Negros/France/IBM on 13/07/2006 19:03 ----- > > Pascal Negros/France/IBM > 13/07/2006 09:51 > > To > [email protected] > cc > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eclipse Process Framework Project > Developers List <[email protected]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject > Re: [epf-dev] Ballot for voting on PM process element names and next PM > call > > > > > > Myvote below ... I have an assumption (based on the reading of the > different thread) : we are talking Development Management rather than > generally speaking Project Management (Development Mgt could be a part of > a more global Project or a project by itself but dediciated to > development). This assumption is confirmed by the current target usage of > Eclipse: Development. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Pascal Negros/France/IBM, 33-0869 > [EMAIL PROTECTED], +33 (0) 149 050 869 > Enterprise Architectures Engineering, Business Strategy Alignment, > Governance of Transformation > Blue Pages Get more > > > > > > "Chris Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 07/07/2006 10:18 > > Please respond to > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Please respond to > Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> > > > To > "'Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List'" > <[email protected]> > cc > > Subject > [epf-dev] Ballot for voting on PM process element names and next PM call > > > > > > > > > Here is the ballot for voting on PM process element names. I attempted to > include the various names people have suggested for these things as > choices. If there are any that I overlooked or if there are new ones that > people would like to suggest, feel free to write them in under "Other". To > cast your vote, reply to this email message, copy me > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), and place an '"x" in one of the boxes > that precede each choice to indicate your vote for each element. The > voting closes at 12:00am Friday 7/14 which will allow us to tally the > votes and report the results at the next PM conference call (scheduled for > 8am PST Friday 7/14) and the epf-dev mail list. > ============================================================ > Role #1: [ X ] Development lead, [ ] Project manager, [ ] Team lead, [ ] > Technical lead, [ ] Other: _______________ > Work Product #1: [ X ] Development plan, [ ] Project plan, [ ] Release > plan, [ ] Other: _______________ > Work Product #2: [ ] Development item list, [ ] Product backlog, [ ] > Development backlog, [ X] Work item list, [ ] Release backlog, [ ] > Cross-project backlog, [ ] System work item list, [ ] Project work item > list, [ ] Other: _______________ > Work Product #3: [ X] Iteration plan, [ ] Other: _______________ : > Iteration plan should be a combination of work plan, risk plan, resource > plan, finacial plan, ..... I should also be placed in context of the > global project plan (the one which contains the considered Development > (sub-)project plus other (sub-) projects within the global endeavour of > the engagement). > Work Product #4: [ X] Task list, [ ] Sprint backlog, [ ] Work item list, [ > ] Team work item list, [ ] Iteration work item list, [ ] Other: The Task > List should be organized in a breakdown structure, based on a product > breakdown structure and the resource organization. Notice that there is a > dependency between the WBS and the PBS but not a 1 to 1 correspondance; > recommended representation of placing this inside of Work Product #3 > Work Product #5: [ X] Risk list, [ ] Other: _______________ > Work Product #6: [ X] Status assessment, [ ] Other: _______________ > Report #1: [ X] Development burndown, [ ] Release burndown, [ ] Project > burndown, [ ] Other: _______________ > Report #2: [ X] Iteration burndown, [ ] Sprint burndown, [ ] Other: > _______________ > ============================================================ > Thanks, Chris ~:| > Chris Armstrong ~:| > President > Armstrong Process Group, Inc. > 651.491.5575 c > 715.246.0383 f > www.aprocessgroup.com > "proven practical process" > Come see APG at: > --------------- > Agile 2006 International Conference > Minneapolis, MN, July 23-28, 2006 - www.agile2006.com > --------------- > 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference > Minneapolis, MN, September 11-15, 2006 - www.re06.org > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > Practice Leader Agile Development, IBM Rational http://www.ambysoft.com/scottAmbler.html Refactoring Databases ( http://www.ambysoft.com/books/refactoringDatabases.html ) is now available. _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
