The review of the OpenUP 0.9 Development package has been posted to Bugzilla in the following entries:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168722 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168723 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168724 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168725 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168727 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168728 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168730 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168731 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168734 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168735 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168736 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168737 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168739 The review was focused on accomplishing the following: * Removing content that doesn't apply to small agile teams * Removing excessive content that small teams are not likely to read or use * Identifying more examples and guidance that would benefit small teams * Align disciplines with other areas of OpenUP (e.g. using the WIL) * General comments on discipline practices Thanks, Jim ____________________ Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational RUP Content Developer Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 760.505.3232 fax: 949.369.0720
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
