Diego, We don't have a specific date that Eclipse legal has committed to give us the approval. Unfortunately, that's not in our control :-) Onno said we are dealing with issues they raise as they analyze the code, so I hope we are moving forward helping them in their analysis.
Another related topic we expect legal to give a position soon is about how to 'legally' harvest content written in the Wiki (e.g. translation) back into the project (namely, into CVS). Regards, Ricardo Balduino Senior Software Engineer IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf) "Pamio, Diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/23/2007 06:51 PM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <[email protected]> To "Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <[email protected]> cc Subject [epf-dev] epfwiki Any news on the legal aspects of the epfwiki addition to epf-composer publishing mechanism? To which date the Eclipse Legal guys have committed to give a verdict on the topic? I mean, baselining process, comparing versions and having rss feeds could automatically deploy several CMMi best practices on OPD/OPF that our Organization and many others will surely appreciate. If not possible to get the donated code, then I will suggest adding these features to the current epf-composer in the hard way (coding ;-)) Regards and thank you in advance, Diego N. Pamio asdc Argentina Software Development Center Intel Software de Arg. ++54 351 414 5571 _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
