Olá Ricardo Nao cheguei a colocar nada relativo aos bugs que resolvi no cvs porque quando cheguei do jantar já estava no periodo que voce pediu para nao introduzir alterações. Agora já é muito tarde para mim ... vou tentar fazer amanha mas tenho a manha muito ocupada pelo que não sei se tenho tudo pronto antes da review :-(
até amanha Ana On 7/3/07, Ricardo Balduino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OpenUP team, I hope that all the necessary work has been done in the OpenUP library to address this bug. I encourage you to synchronize with CVS (the should be re-synched), then look for occurrences of "OpenUP/Basic" (via Composer or published web site). Please let me know any feedback you may have by adding a comment in Bugzilla (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=191330). This bug is expected to be verified and closed tomorrow (as part of ending M9 iteration). Thank you, Ricardo Balduino IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf) *Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/2007 12:18 PM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List < epf-dev@eclipse.org> To epf-dev@eclipse.org cc Subject Re: [epf-dev] Remove /Basic from OpenUP/Basic I ran some tests with a sample library and noticed that importing HTML after renaming plug-in will work fine, except that when you change a package name or presentation name for an element, the import will apply the original names back. Assuming that the copy-editor will apply changes to element content, but not names, so I guess we're safe to make changes in the library, like renaming elements that contain '/Basic'. I can coordinate with copy-editor and remove '/Basic/ from content as well. That being said, OpenUP authors, please commit any changes to CVS by 1:30 PM PDT today (sorry for the short notice). Please wait until I post a note later with further information on whether you can continue authoring content in the library available in CVS. Thanks, Ricardo Balduino IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf) *Ricardo Balduino/Cupertino/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/2007 09:21 AM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List < epf-dev@eclipse.org> To Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@eclipse.org> cc Subject Re: [epf-dev] Remove /Basic from OpenUP/Basic I understand your concern about impact on any extensions. I'm reticent with these changes now, because we have ~100 files checked out for copy-editing. We exported HTML files using RMC so the copy-editor could work on them, then we are going to import them back. If we change file names, hopefully the tool will still look for the elements IDs and import correctly. There is also the question if CVS will still understand that those files where checked out, even after we change names across the library. Those are my questions... at the end of the day, everything may work fine though. Any experiences out there that warrant us moving ahead and making those changes to the library given the scenario we have today? Please let me know. Ricardo Balduino IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational) Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf) *Per Kroll/Cupertino/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/30/2007 09:34 PM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List < epf-dev@eclipse.org> To Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List <epf-dev@eclipse.org> cc epf-dev@eclipse.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Re: [epf-dev] Remove /Basic from OpenUP/Basic Hi, my major concern is what changes are required to names of files, plug-ins, libraries, etc. The reason for that is that those changes would impact any extensions. If we wait until we got files back from editing, we are doing these changes 2 weeks before release. Is that too late? Is my fear warranted? Does it make sense to do all changes to file names, plug-ins, libraries now, and to the files that are locked for ediring once they are back? Cheers Per Kroll STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework Rational Software, IBM Corp (M) 408-219-2963 *"Jaana Nyfjord" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/26/2007 11:47 AM Please respond to Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List < epf-dev@eclipse.org> To epf-dev@eclipse.org cc Subject [epf-dev] Remove /Basic from OpenUP/Basic Hi all! Find enclosed a list of pages where the "/Basic" is used (bug 191330 - reconsider the OpenUP/Basic moniker). The list is 3 pages. It is suggested that we find a person that takes on the task of removing the "/Basic", and who also double checks that I didn't miss any occurrence of the "/Basic". Would any of you be able to take this on? Cheers Jaana N.[attachment "Bug 191330_june25.doc" deleted by Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM] _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
