It does seem like a bug. Could you please file a bugzilla ?

Regards,
Shilpa Toraskar
EPF Committer


                                                                       
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
             f-cr.uclm.es                                              
             Sent by:                                                   To
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]         [email protected]             
             clipse.org                                                 cc
                                                                       
                                                                   Subject
             10/24/2007 10:26          [epf-dev] Bug in activity diagrams?
             AM                                                        
                                                                       
                                                                       
             Please respond to                                         
              Eclipse Process                                          
             Framework Project                                         
              Developers List                                          
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                         
                   org>                                                
                                                                       
                                                                       




Hi.
I think I've found a bug related to activity diagrams.
I'll try to explain this with an example:
We have a capability pattern "a" with several task descriptors.
We make an activity diagram using swinlanes, start and end nodes, etc.
We make another capability pattern "b".
We copy cp "a" into cp "b".

The problem comes when publishing the cp "b":
The elements in the activity diagram for the cp "a" (which was copied into
"b") are misplaced: the tasks don't appear within the swinlanes, and there
are no connections with the start and end nodes, as they were defined in
the original capability pattern "a" before copying it into "b".

I would be very pleased if someone could confirm if this is a bug. If my
explanations aren't clear enough, please, just let me know and i'll try to
explain it better.

Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Javier Verdugo.



_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

<<inline: graycol.gif>>

<<inline: pic13737.gif>>

<<inline: ecblank.gif>>

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Reply via email to