Disculpa Javier. NO ví que eras precisamente tu quien hacia la pregunta. ---------------------------------------------- Francisco Ruiz Gonzalez Dep. de Tecnologías y Sistemas de Información Escuela Superior de Informática Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha Paseo de la Universidad, 4 13071 Ciudad Real (ESPAÑA/SPAIN) tlf: +34.926-295300 ext 3741 fax: +34.926-295354 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://alarcos.inf-cr.uclm.es/per/fruiz/ ----------------------------------------------
> -----Mensaje original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En > nombre de Javier Verdugo Lara > Enviado el: martes, 05 de febrero de 2008 10:01 > Para: [email protected] > Asunto: [epf-dev] Question about published work product descriptors > > Hello, > I've got a question about published work product descriptors. > > This is the scenario: > 1) We have 3 capability patterns "a", "b" & "c". > 2) We add several tasks that use a work product "p" to "a", "b" & "c" (so > we have 3 descriptors for that work product, one for every capability > pattern) > 3) We have another capability pattern "d" where we apply "a", "b" & "c" > (with extended variability). > 4) We publish the cp "d" and see the "Work product usage" tab. > 5) The descriptor published for "p" in "d" it's the descriptor published > in "a". > > Is it the intended behavior? > I think the descriptor published por "p" in "d" should be an aggregation > of the descriptors in "a", "b" & "c", at least in their relationships, as > the aggregation of their textual descriptions wouldn't be easy. > > Thanks in advance for your response, > Javier. > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
