I don't know I think you got it right the first time. Firstly, I don't think its fair for any one group to claim copyright to the term Change Management. Secondly the term "Basic" is almost pejorative and somehow diminishes the importance of the practice (think about Basic Project Management, Basic Architecture etc). Thirdly, I'm not sure we need a qualifier, one would think the context would be sufficient if we put "Basic" before one practice what does that mean about the other practices.
My $0.03 On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Macisaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chris Sibbald and I would like to make this change to address concerns > raised by reviewers. > The basic concern is that they expected from the name that this would be a > formal change management practice, and it's not. > > See bugzilla: > > > *243928* <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=243928> > > > > > I plan to make this change tomorrow, so if there are any concerns at all > with this, please let me know as soon as possible. > > Thanks, > > Bruce MacIsaac > Manager - RUP/OpenUP Content > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > phone: (408)463-5140 > > > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > >
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
