Hi Onno,
 
The idea is to contribute the document to the EPF community.
 
I also intend to continue to enhance it and it would nice to have the
document reviewed.  There are some open questions in the document which I
think should be closed.
 
I can send the word document to anyone interested.
 
Thanks for positive reactions.
 
Best regards,
 
Bjorn

  _____  

From: epf-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:epf-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] On
Behalf Of Onno van der Straaten
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:53 AM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] EPF Manual


Hi Bjorn,
It got through in the end? I can see the text and I can open the file.

This looks to me like a very useful and comprehensive document on EPF. Nice
work! Do you want to contribute this to the EPF community? If this is the
case I think we can publish it on the EPF site with the other Getting
Started <http://www.eclipse.org/epf/general/getting_started.php>  stuff. I
am willing to take care of that if there are no objections to posting it
there.

The developer list 'was' also used btw for sending inputs on EPF Composer
but it has not been used that way recently. IMHO the dev list should be used
this way, to discuss amongst other things, ideas on EPF Composer. The dev
list discussion and sharing of ideas opinions could lead to a record being
created in Bugzilla for more formal tracking of a change/request.

There is also a newsgroup but that group is more focused on supporting end
users. So the newsgroup could also be a good place to share this work with
the community. Or we can do both: add to the EPF site and share the link in
the newsgroup.

Best Regards,
Onno


On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, The Viking on the French Riviera
<bjorn.t...@gmail.com> wrote:


I must be doing something wrong in attempting to communicate with the EPF
developer community.  I have sent the following text and file multiple times
to the epf-dev@eclipse.org list but it does not seem to get through.  I have
noticed that the mailing list is mostly used for coordination purposes.  The
wiki seems to be used for the practices and I am not quite sure how to send
inputs concerning the EPF Composer itself.
 

  _____  

 
I have written a manual for the EPF Composer, containing installation and
configuration instructions, tutorials and a user manual.  It is a draft
version, created from the help files and from the experience gathered while
experimenting with the application.
 
One point bothered me in the EPF Composer.  I would have found it more
natural to have the Plug-ins split into two different types: Method Plug-ins
and a Process Plug-ins.  It does not seem natural, once the subject area has
been nicely decomposed into an hierarchical model with sub-areas having
their own plug-ins and content packages, to have to have processes in one of
these plug-ins access the method content in the other plug-ins.  The need
for the processes to use the services of an outside service, i.e. a default
configuration, to be able to access the content in the other plug-ins, makes
it even more convoluted.  It would be more logical to separate out the
processes code from the method content plug-in into a process plug-in type
and move/copy the code from the configuration’s "Plug-in and Package"
selection over to this new plug-in type so that the process by its very
nature can access other method content plug-ins/packages.  The Configuration
would then no longer have the hybrid functions of both providing access
assistance to processes and configuration for publishing.  It would seem to
be a cleaner separation: the method content plug-in provides static method
content, the process plug-in provides processes and configuration provides
configurations for publishing.
 
It seems that the authors of EPF Practices have made the same observation,
since they have created a method plug-in with the name of "Process",
accessing content packages in the "Practice" method content plug-in.
 
Regards,
 
Bjorn 

Bjorn Tuft

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev




_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Reply via email to