Rick,

Others may chime into this, but I think the rationale for organizing the 
methods (as you ask below) was straightforward, IMHO.
We wanted to show examples of methods captured in EPF. For example, Scrum 
and XP content does not use some of the method constructs (such as 
disciplines). Other methods, such as OpenUP, leverage practices from Scrum 
and XP and also use other structural elements such as disciplines, 
domains, phased WBS, etc. 
No right or wrong way of doing it (again IMHO)  - just different examples 
of how one can leverage the process framework provided by EPF.

I hope this helps address some of your questions.
Ricardo.
 





From:   richard.mur...@gsa.gov
To:     epf-dev@eclipse.org
Date:   01/31/2011 01:26 PM
Subject:        [epf-dev] method comparison of up, xp and scrum
Sent by:        epf-dev-boun...@eclipse.org




I recently psoted the follpwing question to the EPF forum, but received no 
response. Would anyone here have an insight ?

Would anyone involved in earlier discussions on creating the content for 
the xp and scrum method libraries be able to say why decisions were made 
to select only one discipline (scrum_activities) for the scrum method 
library and no disciplines for the xp method library? If the answer is 
something to the effect that we're like constitutional scholars and the 
approach to embedding the method content in the method library is very 
formal and the methods do not formally acknowledge disciplines, I 
understand. However, I thought tailoring consistent with the intent of the 
unified process. If I remember correctly, that would be the role of the 
process engineer. Assuming the decisions made as reflected in the current 
method libraries, how do the method library authors of the xp and scrum 
method libraries intend to represent the juxtaposition of what should be 
abstracted disciplines against phases as in the up hump chart which seems 
essential to the nature of iterative, incremental methods? 

Best wishes,

Rick

office: 202-501-9199
cell: 202-557-1604_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev

Reply via email to