Subversion is also an option we should explicitly consider. I prefer it to Git. The reason for it is that Git still has some way to go in terms of user friendliness. But both are a big improvement to using CVS so I would personally welcome the change.
I made some inquiries okt 2010 about moving away from CVS see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=328234. The bugzilla is still open. Should we put this to a vote? We can use this bugzilla to collect the votes from the committer members (tool and content developers). The migration is a automated process I think so that helps. Of course we will need to update manuals, guidelines on EPF site, I am willing to contribute to that. Best Regards, Onno On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgav...@gmail.com>wrote: > I've read that all Eclipse projects must move to git until December > 21/2012. But I couldn't find any ticket for this in EPF's bugzilla . > > So, when EPF team will take care of this subject? > > regards, > > Cristiano > > _______________________________________________ > epf-dev mailing list > epf-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev > >
_______________________________________________ epf-dev mailing list epf-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
