Hi Ismael,
SAFe is copyrighted, so we could only publish SAFe for small groups with
permission of the Scaled Agile organization.
Something involving ISO/IEC 29110 sounds interesting, but again, we'd have
to look into the copyright issues.
Bruce MacIsaac
Solution Architect, IBM Engineering Lifecycle Products / Engineering Method
Composer (MEC)
bmacis...@us.ibm.com
209-213-3037
From: Ismael Olea <ism...@olea.org>
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@eclipse.org>
Date: 11/03/2019 02:54 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [epf-dev] Restoring epf.eclipse.org ideas
Sent by: epf-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:41 PM <b...@stlcc.org> wrote:
As you know, epf.eclipse.org displayed OpenUP, Scrum and others in
Composer format.
Yes, but not only that. The web is hosted with a RoR application for
gathering feedback for the published models.
If the site is revived should we add SAFe for small groups ?
Don't know about SAFe. Could you provide any link please?
Should we add ISO/IEC 29110: Software Engineering Standards for very
small entities (ISO/IEC 29110) ?
Your thoughts ?
I could provide the 29110 material I responsible of. But not sure if the
project policy is to publish the EPF project hosted (I mean in SCM) methods
only or not.
Bruce, what do you think?
--
Ismael Olea
http://olea.org/diario/_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
