>we're doing our best to let Epiphany be a document-oriented Can I take the time to argue *against* being document-oriented?
I imagine that document-oriented interfaces work well when editing a document. It encourages the user to think of the current view as *being* the document. For example, there's no point having multiple views of a single irc channel. Or multiple views of a single directory in Nautilus. But there is no editing of webpages (unless you count a wiki). It is clear to the user that each browser window provides just a view of the underlying document, in the same way that I can walk into a room of mirrors and see an object multiple times. I understand that when I manipulate things in Epiphany I am just manipulating the view, and not the webpage itself. Though maybe I don't understand document-oriented interfaces so well. :) Regards, Peter. _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
