On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 03:37 -0400, Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 10/24/2005 02:54 AM, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 23:16 +0200, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > The trademark issue is a real problem for Debian and Ubuntu because of > > strict license policy. Archlinux has permission to use the official > > logos, so it isn't a real issue for us. > > About XULRunner: do we _NEED_ to be compatible with XUL? I haven't seen > > a single web application written in XUL yet. Most of the stuff I see is > > either serverside, ActiveX, Flash or Java. > > > > XULRunner is essentially mozilla.org's codename for "libgecko". It will > include support for XPCOM, Gecko, core networking. It will also include > XUL support. You want to be compatible with XULRunner. > > Reading material: > http://wiki.mozilla.org/XUL:Xul_Runner#The_XULRunner_Runtime
Ah, looks nice. So in the near future I can have epiphany without firefox on my system :) _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
