On 11/17/05, Adam Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:40 +0100, Alexander Nagel wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > i don't want to mess anybody up but i'm just curious why epiphany uses > > gecko and not gtkhtml? > > Is gtkhtml so bad for a browser? > > In short... yes. Unfathomably horrible. It just doesn't have what it > takes; it's written do display emails. > > It wouldn't be difficult to plug in a gtkhtml renderer instead of gecko. > There was one for Galeon a long time ago, before the fork. But it > renders badly.
There's also work going on to replace gtkhtml with gecko in evolution. I believe the composer is the main challenge at this point. _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
